by WarmWash 4 hours ago

The public will get ~5.5 level models.

Private industry will essentially get ITAR access to better models, and other countries will get 5.5 with maybe some select partners getting access.

Its totally sensible that the US will keep strong AI to itself to boost its own industry.

(ITAR is a very low bar, but you need to be a citizen and your employer must fill out some forms.)

danmaz74 4 hours ago | [-1 more]

According to this logic, Taiwan should keep the most advanced chips to itself, the EU should keep the most advanced chip lithography machines to itself, etc etc.

WarmWash 2 hours ago | [-0 more]

I mean, yeah they could. But what they get back for exporting is more than it is worth to them alone. Taiwan has no use for huge amounts of silicon and Europe has no use for SOTA lithography.

I don't see how that is the case with the US and leading edge AI. The US has a lot of use for that, and on balance, I cannot think of anything that is more valuable than super intelligent AI. It's basically the end game power for the human race.

Countries could try what essentially amounts to unilateral sanctions on the US to try and force sharing, but it's unlikely it would go well.

By the way, China will lock it's super smart AI in house too.

This isn't a new idea either, both the US and China have technology already that they keep to themselves.

CamperBob2 4 hours ago | [-1 more]

Its totally sensible that the US will keep strong AI to itself to boost its own industry.

No, it isn't. What in the world would lead you to think that will be an option?

Anything we develop can and will be duplicated elsewhere and distributed widely.

WarmWash 2 hours ago | [-0 more]

If I told you money gets disturbed widely, you would obviously balk.

So what could possibly lead you to think power will be distributed widely?

tmpz22 4 hours ago | [-0 more]

“Private industry” as defined by Musk, Ellison, Kushner and Trump.

Im so sick of winning. Im so happy for the future of the US and humanity. Yey tech bros.