by cherryteastain 6 hours ago

His research is in Game Theory. He should have realized that, in a situation where all competitors are (possibly) using LLMs, the game theoretic optimal choice is to use LLMs.

heresie-dabord 23 minutes ago | [-0 more]

Another irony from TFA:

"We economists understand reality as a set of people responding to optimization problems with restrictions."

goldenarm 5 hours ago | [-5 more]

That depends on the reward function. Should society reward credentials or skill?

janalsncm 2 hours ago | [-0 more]

Students aren’t optimizing for what is best for society. They are optimizing for themselves, which almost always means getting a job.

The credential is a prerequisite but skills are a differentiator. Problem is, not all skills are equal.

Amazon isn’t going to ask you about your opinions on The Illiad, they are going to check if you can write an efficient algorithm to rob houses or merge sorted linked lists.

sokoloff 4 hours ago | [-0 more]

Ideally a mix of skill and will.

Earned credentials are a marker that you once demonstrated some sufficient combination of both.

bagels 4 hours ago | [-0 more]

Society rewards credentials and skill. So both are but one is easier to get with cheating.

5 hours ago | [-0 more]
[deleted]
r_lee 5 hours ago | [-0 more]

"Should" is one thing, reality is another

krackers 5 hours ago | [-3 more]

Game Theory seems sort of useless in the real world because people are not rational players, and the real challenge is in getting an accurate model of their behavior. The honor system would work probably fine in a tiny close-knit liberal arts college, while it would obviously wouldn't in a place where the degree itself is the target.

forlorn_mammoth 4 hours ago | [-0 more]

Game theory seemed kind of useful when the US was negotiating nuclear weapons control with the Soviets. It allowed successful negotiations in an extremely low trust situation.

Also, your own example is an application of game theory; you've basically stated a 'prisoner's dilemma' problem. You state that in a high trust society, most people will choose cooperation, while in a low trust society, most people will defect.

mullingitover 4 hours ago | [-1 more]

Aside from evolutionary biology, cancer research, embryonic development, economics, internet routing, spectrum auctions, counter-terrorism, kidney exchanges, generative AI, and preventing nuclear apocalypse...What HAS game theory done for us?!

noxvilleza 4 hours ago | [-0 more]

Proved that everyone asking that question is playing a signalling game!