by gordonhart 10 hours ago
Interesting technique, horrible article. Manages to convey significantly less information than the X thread it mined for ad revenue.
Not sure that's entirely fair - openculture.com is usually pretty good, and the article draws on multiple sources. But I take your word for it that the twitter thread is good and have added it to the top text.
That tweet is not original text either, has no citations, and is not the source of the openculture article.
It's mentioned at the end, IIRC.