by drawnwren 6 hours ago

As much as this is a damning quote, it is perhaps also damning that any time someone wants to smear zuck they have to reach 20 years into the past.

duskdozer 5 hours ago | [-1 more]

There's a big difference between "someone said something stupid as a kid"... "but now has changed and is a totally different person" and "is doing the same things but now knows how not to say the quiet part out loud"

echelon 3 hours ago | [-0 more]

Exactly.

Show us how Meta is a moral player in society.

All I can see are lots of evil behaviors.

hattmall 5 hours ago | [-0 more]

>they have to reach 20 years into the past.

Well, they don't, but this is a particularly damning statement and it's age is more of a feature than a flaw because it shows a long history of anti-social disdain for humanity.

zephyreon 5 hours ago | [-0 more]

Learning to choose your words more wisely as you age does not necessarily indicate your underlying value system has evolved.

sillyfluke 2 hours ago | [-1 more]

>it is perhaps also damning that any time someone wants to smear zuck they have to reach 20 years into the past.

It is perhaps not, and perhaps a bit disingenuous to claim so in good faith, as if it exceeds your abilities to search for the list of facebook scandals in the decades following and see that the behavior is often consistent with this quote. Even if you choose to ignore all that, it's also not very reasonable to expect troves of juicier quotes after all the C-suites, lawyers, and HR departments showed up locked everything down with corporate speak. I'm sure if facebook were to be so kind as to leak all the messages and audio of zuck's internal comms since that time people would be able to have many other juicy quotes to work with.

It is often referenced because it's the best quote that represents the trailblazing era of preying on users' undying thirst for convenience in order to package their private data as a product.

alterom 35 minutes ago | [-0 more]

Thank you for saying this. I would not find a better way to word the response myself.

"It is perhaps not, and perhaps a bit disingenuous to claim so in good faith, as if it exceeds your abilities to search for the list of facebook scandals in the decades following and see that the behavior is often consistent with this quote.

It is often referenced because it's the best quote that represents the trailblazing era of preying on users' undying thirst for convenience in order to package their private data as a product.

These sentences are deliciously delightful to read in this era of writing whose blandness and sloppiness is only amplified by LLM-driven "assistance".

It is difficult to be pithy without being bitter, but your writing achieves it within the span of a single comment. If you have a blog, I hope you share it!

shakna 2 hours ago | [-0 more]
an hour ago | [-0 more]
[deleted]
alterom 24 minutes ago | [-0 more]

>As much as this is a damning quote, it is perhaps also damning that any time someone wants to smear zuck they have to reach 20 years into the past.

Smear is a word that's not applicable here. It implies that the allegations in the argument labeled thusly are wrong and unjust.

This is not the case here.

datatrashfire an hour ago | [-0 more]

or just at any point in the last 20 years to the present works too

6 hours ago | [-0 more]
[deleted]
jcgrillo 6 hours ago | [-0 more]

or more recently the times he lied to Congress, all the layoffs, the "metaverse", etc