by indigodaddy 7 hours ago

The OP title seems a bit misleading notwithstanding this caveat.

dang 24 minutes ago | [-0 more]

I thought that at first too, but then I figured it's pretty impressive that the app is processing $6M/month even though the financial platform pre-existed.

Neywiny 2 hours ago | [-0 more]

I think there's ambiguity. An app built for a platform that does xyz. Does the app do xyz, the platform, or both? If I build an app that takes you straight to idk a Treasury department website, have I built an app for a platform that transacts trillions of dollars?

kbar13 2 hours ago | [-1 more]

seems like this is par for course for hustler “founders” nowadays to say half truths to seem groundbreaking to get attention

jeswin an hour ago | [-0 more]

True. But willing to cut anyone under 21 some slack.